Banned Books Essay

Banned accommodates be neat more(prenominal) current in this daytime of time. People a good deal do not chthonianstand the contest of intensity of accounts or why a book is being proscribed. Ken Petrilli, the author of Banned Books Week Celebrating You (and Celebrating Your (and Your Teens ) independence to Read in the Young Adult Library Services summer of 2009, talks well-nigh how he understand, how the pargonnts tincture about rough books being banned. He also advised ways to make displays for banned books workweek. Petrilli is a teen help librarian, a musician, and serves on the YALSAs Intellectual liberty Committee.To Read or not to Read Understanding Book Censorship by Deborah Connelly, was published in the Community and jr. College Libraries in the year of 2009. In Connellys article, she wants mickle to know what book censorship means and how librarians subscribe with people who want to challenge books. In both articles each writer gives a description of w hy books argon banned. Petrillis article has less information but his credibility comes from his services as being a librarian and serving on the YALSAs Intellectual Freedom Committee.Connellys article has more information but nowhere in her article is her credibility. However, by analyzing both of the articles neither Petrilli nor Connellys articles ar scholarly. In the article Ken Petrillis Banned Books Week Celebrating You (and Your Teens ) Freedom to Read article is to be acquire by unripened with fry(p) and their parents, and other librarians. Young adults often wonder why their parents or other groups testament not allow them to read certain types of books. He state, As teen and young adult librarian we are on the frontline of intellectual granting immunity issues more than anyone else in our profession.(Petrilli 4) succession on the other hand parents do not agree with the materials and content that is in the book that their young adult reads. Where he states Parents concerned about what their children are reading. This, in and of itself, is not necessarily a bad affaire we want to see parents who are concerned (Petrilli 4) In Deborah Connellys article To Read or Not to Read Understanding Book Censorship, talks about how people should call for the right to read. Connelly states While history shows that there are those that try to suppress the right to read, there are also those that bear worked tirelessly to preserve it.(Connelly 84) In challenging and inhibition books many parents often ban so that their child cannot read a book with rudely contents it should be up to the parent to make that finis for their child or young adult to read a certain book. Not to ban the book from the whole community. Connelly states Many of these statements deal with parents being the ultimate role model and advocate in what they tonus is right for their child and how to empower their child to make decisions based on their values in regards to what they read .( ALA2008) (Connelly 86) When a book that is being Challenged aroundly parents or specific groups, the books are sometimes banned because they may break seen or heard that the challenged book may have a little sexual content, profane nomenclature, or unmorally things in its context. The parents or groups who challenged these books do not fully read the materials to get the full instinct. Connelly suggests reading the books forward a parent or group challenges the book because there are a couple of words that they do not agree with.Connelly states Many times those that consider banning a book do so without examining the work. (Jocelyn Chadwick 2000)(Connelly87) According to Petrilli in his article he sympathizes with the parents who have had some parent and groups who had some books banned. He understandably states that, I think it is important for us to remember not to overtly demonize most potential challengers. They are, after all, people just like us, and being concerned f or our childrens well-being is neer wrong. (Petrilli 4) Petrilli also wants to clog the Banned Books Week, by giving suggestions on how to display the library and to have discussions about banned books. He states What I do is important and the fighting for our collections and our teen patrons is a battle. (Petrilli 5) Petrilli feels that people who challenged books because they feel as if these books with the explicit details or pass on corrupt the minds of their young adults. He states This fear is often disguised as moral outrage. They want to believe that if their children dont read about it, their children wont know about it.And if they dont know about it, it wont happen. (Petrilli 4) Connelly believes that during the challenges of banning a book, a librarian has a big role to play. First the librarian has to face the issues of day to day of book challenges and to insure they know the policy. Connelly states, The librarian of today is smooth faced with controversial issues r egarding political sympathies and religious connation within books or any other materials are challenged, these policies will be on break through to refer to as a bases for the selection. (Connelly85) Connelly also believes that if the Office for Intellectual Freedom did not create a policy for the American Library Association there will be a few books that will not be banned today due to all the books that were banned years ago. People will be limited to what they can read. The freedom of reading would vanish. In her article she verbalize The Freedom to read contains seven propositions, each one as important as the other. She also states, To truly feel the warmness and thought placed behind these propositions, one must read them.(Connelly 84) She also suggests that the librarians should know what to do when a book comes up to be challenged. The librarian has to be professional and also opened mined as well when it comes to a parent or group challenging a book or materials. Alt hough librarians have a great deal of responsibility, Connelly states A librarian must keep in mind the some(prenominal)(prenominal)(a) patronage of their establishment and provide materials that are accessible to everyone. (Connelly 85) Connelly also lets her readers know that if he or she are going to challenge a book then he or she should also know the guidelines.A person just cannot go a say I want this book banned or Take this book off the shelf because it is inappropriate for my child or young adult to read. on that point is a process the challenger has to fill out forms, have names of those who assist. Then state the origin why the book or material is being challenged. Connelly also advised her readers that there aptitude be some legal issues in giving young adult sexually explicit materials. So the readers might want to check in their state to find out the laws about simply giving some that is not of age, sexual explicit materials.Connelly states An Oregon law was pas sed that criminalizes the dissemination of sexually explicit material to anyone under the age 13and ect. (Connelly 86) Petrilli casually, lets his readers know that even though there is a banned books week, that there are still going to be a deal of banned books challenges. And books will be banned. Petrilli states Never forget that potential challengers are out there and some are motivated by fervent religious or potential beliefs. (Petrilli 5) By Petrilli being employed as a young adult and teen service librarian he has hands on experience with having books or materials challenged.In the theme of the article Petrilli gives a brief description of what Banned Books week is. He says that, Banned Books Week is observed the last week of September each year and it has been observed every year since 1982. (Petrilli 4) Petrilli also lets the book challengers know that disturb opportunity and access should be the readers right. It should not be because the challenger is not pleased with it. In Petrillis article he states We provide equal access for anyone to whatever it is they are looking to read and that includes the teens we plant life with every day.(Ptetrilli 5) Petrilli also is persuading his readers to participate in Banned Books week as a librarian Petrilli wants his readers to support this event. To Pertilli it is imperative that parents, young adults, and groups so he or she can become more comfortable with their freedom to read or to learn and understand why some books and materials are being challenged and banned from the community. Connelly wants readers to know, that librarians are not against all books being challenged. She states, Librarians are not the only member of need to protect the Freedom to Read.(Connelly 86) She goes on and states Lastly, the most underused but most influential tool that librarians have in dealing with book controversy is their own voices. (Connelly 85) Connelly also wants the challengers to maybe rethink his or her inten t to challenge a book. She clearly states, All in all, censorship is based on fear and emotions. (Connelly87) Connelly also states Knowledge is the key to understanding. (Connelly87) In the article Connelly shared that there was a little stir-up about the book that was banned and removed from several libraries which was The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain.This book was said that was banned due to the content of the n used several times in the story. Connelly used this in her article for a perfect example of book banishment. She stated it is easy to see how this could upset people to the point of removing this book from schools. (Connelly 86) Connelly points out to the audience, that the assistant professor at Harvard University, Jocelyn Chadwick had studied Mark Twains work for years. She wanted to get a full understanding of his book.Since people was upset about the book because of the n word was so offended that it never appeared to them that the book was scene was written for the time frame that Mark Twain The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was based on. It seems like Connelly agrees with Jocelyn Chadwick she quote, There are countless resources available to the community that provide information about censorship (pro or against), litigations, organizations, and other reclaimable materials that can assist people to make better informed decisions about questionable literature.(Connelly 87) In the devil articles that have been analyzed, through the types of claim, that Petrilli is proposing that it is to the challengers and non- challengers benefit to attend a Banned Books week at his or her closest library. Connelly suggests that before a person challenge a book read the book form beginning to end, to understand the book better to get the feeling of emotions when reading the book. Who knows the book might not be all that damaging.The rhetorical triangle of Petrillis article had the Emotional appeal. Connellys passage was that of more of an d pellucid appeal. The writing style for Petrillis article was unbiased and casual. Whereas for Connellys writing stlye was biased where she want people to understand what book banning really is. Neither Petrillis nor Connellys articles is scholarly. There was not abundant information in Petrillis article and there was no credibility in Connellys article.